I have been looking at this for hours. I see major issues of fairness as I tried to apply the original point system with tweaks. So, here is what we will do. You will earn points in each event you play that are equal to the average rating of the two rounds played. Your total series score will be equal to the sum of your best 3 events. If you play in all 5 events, you will get to drop the two worst rated events from your overall points.
I am sorry for changing this, but I just did not feel what I was trying to do with original method was a fair way to measure performance.
Also, to be fair to all competitors in the end of season drawings, you earn 3 entries to the drawing for every event that you play in. If you play in 3 events, you get 9 entries. Play in all 5, you get 15. This way it is truly random where every has equal chance instead of being based on points which would put lower rated players at a significant disadvantage.
I have been looking at this for hours. I see major issues of fairness as I tried to apply the original point system with tweaks. So, here is what we will do. You will earn points in each event you play that are equal to the average rating of the two rounds played. Your total series score will be equal to the sum of your best 3 events. If you play in all 5 events, you will get to drop the two worst rated events from your overall points.
I am sorry for changing this, but I just did not feel what I was trying to do with original method was a fair way to measure performance.
Also, to be fair to all competitors in the end of season drawings, you earn 3 entries to the drawing for every event that you play in. If you play in 3 events, you get 9 entries. Play in all 5, you get 15. This way it is truly random where every has equal chance instead of being based on points which would put lower rated players at a significant disadvantage.