Pittock Conservation Park

Woodstock, Ontario     1 course · 18 holes

Course reviews

Sign In or Sign Up to review this course.
Most votes   |   Newest first   |   Oldest first
-  -1 votes  + Todd Kelly › June 22, 2021
C+
I played this course yesterday and I can barely remember any of the holes. Not bad but not memorable at all. A couple picnic tables would be nice.
-  +0 votes  + stephen speechley › September 26, 2020
C
you don't have to pay to get in anymore is a huge bonus
-  +0 votes  + Owen McMillan › June 14, 2019
A-
-  +0 votes  + Mackenzie Langford › July 24, 2018
B+
Course presents a good mix of shot types and distances for both the beginner and more advanced disc golf player.
-  +0 votes  + Larry Hibbitts › July 31, 2017
B-
First time playing - have to pay to get into the park. Greens are well maintained, but the marking for the holes are lacking. Lucky I had my UDisc app to help me find the tee boxes.
-  +0 votes  + Azize Lepine › December 13, 2015
B+
-  -1 votes  + Patrick Treude › June 20, 2021
B+
-  +3 votes  + Ethan Brown › March 17, 2014
A-
This is one of my favorite courses. Pittock is a beautiful course with a great layout and holes with a variety of length. the DG community is very friendly for a bonus.
-  +0 votes  + Ken Myers › September 29, 2012
B+
-  +0 votes  + Shannon Hamill › April 27, 2012
B+
-  +1 votes  + Dave Koe › April 10, 2012
B+
The new layout is great. Most holes are not overly long, but tight fairways compensate and if you play the long grass as O.B it makes for a challanging course. Signature hole is teeing off from the top of the dam.
-  +0 votes  + Jeff Kennah › April 13, 2012
B+
Nice course with a combination of wooded, parkland and open field holes. Good signage and the course flows well. Shorts are short and the long are just right. If alternate "tournament " tee-pads for maximum distance could be introduced, then the pros would be heavily challenged.
-  +0 votes  + lester Bereziuk › January 5, 2012
C+
-  +1 votes  + Tim Young › January 6, 2012
C+
Really like the layout of the course, but it needs teepads! Tee-off areas were wet, muddy, and very slippery. Also, the long grass needs to be cut. With some maintenance + teepads, this could be an awesome course.
-  +0 votes  + Scott Nowack-Thompson › August 12, 2011
B+
Redesigned course in July 2010. Tee signs installed in June 2011. Course map and score cards available at gatehouse.
Some fairways and landing areas need to be cut wider to allow for amateur players a chance to find their disc and shot from the short grass. Spotters required on at least 3 or 4 holes due to long grass and weeds.
-  +0 votes  + Atom Czar › July 16, 2011
D
Fairways, if you would call them that, were as narrow as a single pass with a lawn tractor. If the throw wasn't near perfect, you had to hunt for it in long grass or weeds. Paying to play this course was a little frustrating.(but I am a cheep SOB) Nice layout for most of the holes. Score card w/ map that was provided at the gates was fantastic, and absolutely helpful.
-  +0 votes  + John May › July 29, 2011
B+
Tight straight fairways with enough trees to keep it interesting. The long grass on the sides of the fairways are really annoying, and we spent a lot of time looking for lost discs.
-  +1 votes  + Vern Lepine › August 20, 2021
B-
Front 9 as far as distance and difficulty go,this is good course for 200+, and not bad for experienced players who want to home their mid skills. Tee signs distance make finding next tee fairly easy. Baskets were in great shape. Park was clean, well maintained, grass completely mowed with no chance of losing disc on the fairway. Front 9 and back 9 are totally two differnt courses. Back 9 when not cut disc get gobbled up in the brush that can be 3 to 4 ft high with blind shots at the baske ...
continue reading ›
We use cookies to improve user experience.